pie

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Demographic data can say a lot about who lives in a city. It can also be an indicator of that city’s finances.

Generally speaking, if a city has a high number of residents who consume more public resources than they contribute to the tax base, there will more likely be potential problems for that city’s fiscal outlook.

Robert Inman, a University of Pennsylvania professor, has conducted research exploring how “bad” demographics act as a risk factor for cities. He’s devised a figure — 35 percent of a city’s population being either elderly or living in poverty — that, if exceeded, could signal significant fiscal problems. It’s based on the assumption that at this level, middle-income residents will pay roughly 20 percent higher taxes for the same services as they would in nearby jurisdictions, leading them to consider moving out of the city.

“Cities are going to feel this kind of demographic pressure on their budgets,” said Inman. “But good economies and good policies can overcome the demographic disadvantage.”

Share in poverty older than 75 years or 18 or younger (selected cities):

59.1% – Camden, New Jersey

55.8% – Flint, Michigan

54.8% – Detroit

51.1% – Cleveland

49.2% – Jackson, Mississippi

48.1% – Buffalo

47.6% – Newark, New Jersey

46.5% – Milwaukee

45.8% – Birmingham

44.7% – Memphis

43.6% – Phoenix

43.3% – Miami

42.9% – Chattanooga

42.6% – Dallas

41.7% – Knoxville

41.4% – St. Louis

41.1% – Baltimore

40.8% – Little Rock

40.7% – New Orleans

39.6% – Chicago

39.5% – Kansas City

39.3% – Louisville/Jefferson County

38.3% – Atlanta

38.0% – Murfreesboro

36.9% – Raleigh

36.7% – Nashville/Davidson

35.1% – Portland, Oregon

34.0% – Austin

29.3% – Seattle

Share Unemployed, Workers Earning Below Poverty Rate (selected cities):

74.4% – Flint

73.5% – Detroit

70.2% – Camden, New Jersey

66.8% – Cleveland

64.3% – Newark, New Jersey

63.8% – Jackson, Mississippi

61.1% – Birmingham

60.1% – Memphis

59.7% – Milwaukee

59.1% – Chattanooga

58.2% – Baltimore

58.1% – Phoenix

56.9% – New Orleans

56.8% – Miami

56.7% – St. Louis

55.6% – Dallas

55.4% – Little Rock

55.3% – Chicago

55.1% – Louisville/Jefferson County

54.8% – Knoxville

53.2% – Kansas City

53.1% – Murfreesboro

52.2% – Atlanta

50.0% – Portland, Oregon

49.8% – Raleigh

49.7% – Nashville/Davidson County

46.3% – Austin

42.1% – Seattle

Source: Governing magazine

***

Join us at the Smart City Memphis Facebook page for daily articles, reports, and commentaries relevant to Memphis and the conversations that begin here.