The sound defeat of a referendum to increase the local option sales tax rate to pay for much-needed Pre-K programs for Memphis children is a reminder of how easy it is to position almost any issue as a fight between the haves and the have-nots.
It’s also a reminder of how some people seem willing to widen that divide for their own political narcissism, but the saddest thing of all was how many voters ended up confused about the facts and about who’s telling the truth and frustrated by the rancorous debate about something as fundamental as the future of our children, and in the end, many of them voted against their own personal self-interest as a result.
It’s hard to think of a better case study at the ballot box of how the perfect can be the enemy of the good. Memphis voted down the good after a steady diet of untruths, fear-mongering, anecdotal information, conspiracy theories, and more. It was a sad day for many reasons, and only one was the result of the referendum.
It’s easy to chalk up the vote as further evidence of a city that cares too little about itself and the issues that matter most if Memphis is to move from its customary position on the bottom rungs for most indicators that define a successful city – young professionals, college attainment, per capita income, jobs growth, and talent.
A Bridge Too Far
Polling in Memphis has consistently shown that a majority of the public favors Pre-K, but in special referenda, polling results are much less important than the results of a thorough GOTV plan because in the end, it’s all about getting out your vote. It is a cliché – but nonetheless true – that when you have ample funding, an issue that a majority of the public supports, and you still fail, it is a given that the campaign strategy or execution was flawed in some way.
Perhaps, as much as anything, the decision to schedule a referendum to increase sales taxes in the wake of increases of the City of Memphis property tax rate and fees made this an uphill battle. Second, just like the failed Pre-K campaign of last year, there was too much of an assumption that the public really understands what Pre-K really is. Third, most single issue referenda have to spark an emotional connection that motivates supporters to go to the polls, and the emotional battle was being won by opponents.
We’re not saying that some high-profile opponents to the Pre-K funding proposal didn’t have philosophical or practical problems with this particular approach. After all, some of them supported the countywide sales tax increase that went down to defeat last year (and some of the people who were in favor of a city-only sales tax increase were against last year’s proposal). Some of these people also perceived an implied slap at Shelby County Schools in the Pre-K plan’s separate process and structure for implementing Pre-K.
At times, it seemed that the referendum was about everything but Pre-K. It was a referendum about Mayor Wharton, about the city Councilmen leading the campaign, about the regressive system of Tennessee taxes (which city government is powerless to change), about whether the campaign was a property tax decrease for the middle class in Pre-K clothing, about city government priorities, and about much more.
All that aside, there are many Memphis voters who grow weary of the adult games that deal with power and control and who’s a political winner and who’s a political loser when all they want is Pre-K for every child in Memphis.
Trying Something Different
Now that we’ve tried to pass a sales tax increase two ways in two years and both failed, maybe it’s time to approach this as a community-building campaign rather than a typically political one.
It seems clear that we need more people to feel ownership of this issue and that this ownership needs to be bubbling upward from the grassroots as much as it’s being advocated by a campaign. It needs for more people to feel that they have a voice and become invested in a plan and for a process where all key partners can be engaged as the program is developed. Rather than continue to find success in political tactics and campaigns, perhaps another option is to step back and take the time needed to build a more broad-based, robust grassroots support group for Pre-K.
It also seems to go without saying that if another referendum is scheduled, timing is paramount.
There is nothing in Memphis surrounded by more false information and untruths than City Hall, and for that reason, it seems like whether there is ever another referendum or not, city officials need to mount a dramatic, comprehensive, and continuing informational campaign to get out the facts about city government. It’s been said often in recent weeks by some opponents that they are against the sales tax increase because corrupt city elected officials can’t be trusted to spend the money right.
Stick to the Facts
The willingness by some people to satiate their own political conceit by undermining public confidence in their own government is one of the most disturbing trends in politics today at all levels of government. The fact is that if someone has evidence of corruption in City Hall, they should call the F.B.I. or U.S. Attorney so it can be prosecuted.
Otherwise, they should temper their wild accusations and stick more closely to the truth. Just because you don’t like what someone in local government is doing, the agenda they are pursuing, or their political position, it does not make them corrupt, venal, or amoral.
These are hard times for city governments across the U.S., but they are especially hard for Memphis, because of low property values, high poverty rates, low density, and too much land area in which to deliver public services. These are challenges that deserve Memphis’ best efforts by a people united by a shared commitment to a better future.
Debate and discussion are nothing short of essential in developing an agenda, but demagoguery and epithets should be called what they are: immature behaviors that disrupt the work of people of good will to find common ground for solutions.
No Surrender
Last year, we predicted that the referendum to increase the countywide local option sales tax would fail because city government was slow to support it and did not say soon enough how it would spend the money that it would have received, and this year, we did not expect passage because the timing, the environment, and the political foundation seemed questionable.
It was always a long shot for the referendum to pass in today’s cauldron of negativity, distrust, and frustration about taxes, and those same factors should prevent any consideration of another referendum until a foundation of better information is laid and stronger get out the vote machinery is put in place.
In particular, the failed Pre-K vote should act as a cautionary tale as the Greater Memphis Chamber considers the creation of a PAC and more involvement in important public policy issues. There is a facetious comment in political circles here that the business community has never won an election, and while that is hyperbole, it speaks to the need for business-led initiatives to be as mindful of the need for a process that produces bottom-up support as it is to mount top-down campaigns.
Pre-K is an issue that is too important for Memphis that it will now simply fade away. It can be a key to giving children better opportunities in the future, and it is a link in the chain that reduces the poverty rate in Memphis. But, more than anything, it will be back, because the need to give every child a fair start in life is too important for their future and the future of Memphis for us to ignore it.
~”maybe it’s time to approach this as a community-building campaign rather than a typically political one.” The power of Social Media seems to be overlooked when attempting to connect important initiatives with residents. Like it or not, Facebook is an excellent platform to present, discuss, and share.
Start now.
This entire effort was a plan by rich property owners seeking lower property taxes.
A true democrat (A.C. can you hear me?) would never favor a regressive sales tax increase that harms the poor while supporting a tax rebate to wealthy corporations and individuals.
Well, let’s not just do it with Pre-K, since the Urban Child Institute even says that birth to 3 is the most important time to reach children. http://www.urbanchildinstitute.org/why-0-3/baby-and-brain
Because until poverty is addressed in this community for what it is, a lack of money, instead of what it is not, a lack of character, we’re not attracting anyone of the type you mentioned.
It’s time to fix the city so that everyone in it benefits, not just the Poplar Corridor, where I live.
Rant over.
Steve: You are so right. It is about intervening earlier and ignoring all the Tea Party type drivel questioning it or diverting it into other issues.
McLaughlin: We hear you, but since the largest corporations don’t pay taxes because of PILOTs and the decrease in property taxes would amount to a pittance for wealthy homeowners, we don’t easily accept the notion that it was all about reducing property taxes. Heck, passage of a sales tax increase might have had a better chance than the Pre-K proposal. That said, there are only regressive tax and fee options for City of Memphis, regardless of who the mayor is, because of the state of Tennessee’s highly regressive tax structure. Sadly, the more someone earns in Tennessee, the smaller the percentage paid in taxes. It is the poster child for regressive taxes, but given a choice between two regressive taxes – property and sales – we’ll still take sales because at least it’s being paid by the tens of thousands of people who come in Memphis to work, go to sports and entertainment events, etc.
Maybe I’m just not thinking deeply enough about this, but to me the reason this initiative didn’t pass is very simple.
Yes, we need early (Pre-K) education programs. I can’t imagine anyone looking around this city and reaching any other conclusion. But trusting our city government, which just spent a lot of time, money, and effort, to get OUT of the education business…a business they weren’t very good at to begin with…by sanctioning a tax increase to allow them to get back IN to that very same business, was the bridge too far. I love my city, but we do a LOUSY of job when it comes to handling our money and prioritizing our spending, and we weren’t much better at educating our kids.
So to ask the citizens of this city to fund such a program, by increasing a sales tax that is already one of the highest in the country, was never, ever going to pass in our current circumstances. But I don’t think it was as much about the pre-K program, as it was about the tax increase for ANYTHING. Asking for a sales tax increase to fund cancer vaccines or global peace would have been equally as hard at this time, IMHO.
Great post. I hope you’re right and we get a chance to vote on Pre-K again. It’s way too important for our entire community for this issue to go away. I am a staunch supporter of pre-k and supported the recent campaign but even I grew weary of all the lies being spun by the opposition. You summed it up perfectly – “the willingness by some people to satiate their own political conceit by undermining public confidence in their own government is one of the most disturbing trends in politics today at all levels of government. The fact is that if someone has evidence of corruption in City Hall, they should call the F.B.I. or U.S. Attorney so it can be prosecuted.” Ahem….Kenneth Whalum, are you listening?
S. Steffens (aka LWC) is correct: a critical period in a child’s development is Pre-Natal to age 3. Maybe by age 4 (Pre-K) it’s too late.
What if the Urban Child Institute is funded by SCS to prepare a PLAN involving the schools and day care centers. This would set goals, measure existing capacities, and spell out a seamless network of care givers and teachers. Participation in planning would be at “grass-roots” level with care givers and teachers responding with what they can do.
Then we can have a vote on funding.
I think that the whole Pre-K initiative was ill advised with Wharton appointing some committee to oversee the Pre-K program, which was undefined; and the whole thing seemed to say we don’t trust the new SCS, which is just getting started. Let’s have some success with existing education programs and a new head-start before we do anything else.
This apologize for continuing to fuel the somewhat unrelated matter of the nature of different taxes, but the idea that a tax on sales is anymore regressive than a tax on property really irks me. Also, I am unclear how individuals were able to twist a proposal for a dedicated funding source for pre-k programs meant to serve those with lower incomes so that it reads as a property tax break that benefits only the elite property owners of the city.
Despite all the posturing both before and after the vote as to why the initiative was undeserving of public support, I have yet to hear a reasonable proposal regarding how such a program could be undertaken in a timely manner and would accomplish the same goals. In the end- and whether it was the direct intention of voters to says this or not is irrelevant- some 60% of those who cast a vote essentially confirmed they support the city and its trajectory as it stands today. That is an ominous sign.
Pre-K lost, but who won? Schools lost the chance to raise the number of ready children. Police lost a proven way to keep kids in school and off the streets. Employers lost one of the best pathways to building an educated workforce.
Great point, Doug.
Urbanut: In the end, 5.4% of total voters decided this referendum, which is why we think we have to broaden the ownership and the passion about this. We can’t let this ominous sign stand as representative of Memphis – yes, we’re trying to be hopeful today.
Curt: The sales tax is one of the highest in the U.S. because we don’t have an income tax. It’s either one or the other, but it is interesting to us that every municipality in Shelby County – except Memphis – was willing to increase their sales taxes to 9.75% to support their educational plans. Sadly, Memphis blinked.
It was never clearcut to me that city government had the authority under the city charter or under state law to spend public funds on pre-K since it is not an education agency. It is hard to get voters to vote for a tax increase to fund a program that has no structure. And then there are all those other issues that are mentioned above. There has been so much incorrect information put out about education funding and taxation during the last decade that the whole picture is muddled. A lot of people bear responsibility for that. I don’t see the situation improving any time soon.
This was handled as a class divided campaign like many others in Memphis. We have a history of graduates of elite high schools telling the rest of the City what is good for them.
In this case we had Shea Flynn (MUS Grad) and Jim Strickland (CBHS Grad) spearheading a campaign financed by MUS Grad Pitt Hyde and the aristocrats of the Chamber telling us all that this is what’s needed. And they even set the date so the dumb poor people wouldn’t be voting in such a minor election.
So the elite, Cotton Carnival Crewe types are always smarter than everyone else nad we should always do what they say.
With that said, I did vote for it but I knew it was doomed from the start. It’s hard enough with any tax referendum but I think we can always assume that any that is sold to us by a top down approach will never pass.