We’ve written before about how the U.S. became a gambling nation almost overnight and without any real debate about the pros and cons. That’s why Neal Peirce’s recent column for Citiwire caught our attention:
What if all America were like Las Vegas, with gambling as near as the closest convenience store? Or if states offered blackjack, poker and other casino-style games on-line, as accessible as your personal computer?
That’s the intriguing question that struck me while reading journalist (and self-confessed gambling addict) Sam Skolnik’s new book, “High Stakes: The Rising Cost of America’s Gambling Addiction” (Beacon Press).
Currently, the Washington, D.C. government hopes to install an Internet gambling hub by the end of this year. California and Massachusetts have bills pending. Other states are watching with interest to see if the federal Justice Department chooses to enforce existing law which seems, at face value, to prohibit on-line wagering.
Today’s economies and politics are fueling the push to universalized gambling. State governments struggling with monster deficits are desperate for any new form of revenue. And the nation seems seized by weirdly irrational politics that equates any tax increase with original sin.
Already, government-countenanced (or directly run) gambling is at an historic high water mark. All but seven states have lotteries. Casino gambling, both state-countenanced and run by Indian tribes, is spreading like wildfire, especially in the Northeast. Each year at least half of America’s states consider new gambling outlets. “There is a legalized gambling avalanche in progress in America,” Skolnik concludes.
And at a high price, he adds: newly legalized gambling opportunities invariably create new gamblers. A small but significant percentage get hooked. Gambling addiction leads to unemployment, bankruptcies, divorces, illnesses — and in some of the severest cases, suicide. Addicted gamblers, estimates Baylor University scholar Earl Gronois, cost the United States as much as $50 billion a year.
Aware of the downside, state officials usually agree to set aside some small portions of the new lottery or casino profits for public awareness and gambling treatment programs. But what that really signifies, Skolnik notes, is that state governments are willfully creating a new class of addicts.
Las Vegas provides, inevitably, the ultimate example of a society — and possible a future America — hooked on gambling.
Most Americans think of Vegas’ gambling as the tourist-oriented Strip, with its more than two dozen huge casino resorts. But there’s much more, Skolnik notes: 25-plus full-service neighborhood-based casinos, specifically designed to lure the “locals,” not tourists. (There are also a dozen casinos in the the city’s older downtown, catering in part to local gamblers).
Net result: gambling is Las Vegas’ dominant lifestyle theme. Clark County has 14,000 video poker and slot machines chiming 24 hours a day. They’re located in some 1,400 restaurants, bars and retail outlets ranging from chain grocery and drug stores to 7-Elevens. Shopping centers routinely offer gambling opportunities. Slot machines are right beside pizza parlors and child-care centers. There’s literally no way to escape them.
On top of all that, Vegas’ locally-focused casinos advertise relentlessly, by mail to residents and on billboards across the region. A 2002 statewide study, commissioned by Nevada’s Department of Human Resources, found that 3.5 percent of the state’s population could be classified as “probable” pathological gamblers, and another 2.9 percent slightly less serious gamblers — in other words, one of every 16 adult Nevadans, or roughly 115,000 people.
On average, University of Nevada-Las Vegas scholars William Thompson and William Epstein have found, Clark County adults incur gambling losses averaging $1,511 a year, compared to a U.S.-wide figure of $391.
Can it then be by sheer happenstance that Nevada leads the nation, year by year, in such crimes as murder, rape, aggravated assault, robbery and burglary? That Nevada tops the 50 states in rates of personal bankruptcies and home foreclosures? That the state’s suicide rate regularly doubles the national average?
Message to legislators in the other 49 states: Is the Las Vegas/Nevada model — and price — one you seriously want to emulate?
Not surprisingly, the Las Vegas Valley leads the world with nearly 100 weekly meetings of Gamblers Anonymous, the nonprofit organization that provides support for problem gamblers.
Allowed to sit in on a 2010 Gamblers Anonymous meeting in Vegas, Skolnik heard repeated stories of personal gambling-based tragedies. One woman, in her mid-70s, had been a poker dealer on the Strip and in downtown for some 30 years. She gambled frequently off-duty, often to excess. Eventually she “maxed out” eight credit cards, sold most of her possessions, and purchased a gun. She aimed for her heart, but missed by an inch. And she told of how she’s been in recovery for three years.
Overall, Thompson has estimated, wagering in Las Vegas results in social costs of $900 million a year — and that’s just for local residents, not tourists.
Bottom line: Broadening gambling to relieve states’ budget headaches may be a fatal mistake — not just because it triggers long-term social costs, but for its ugly assault on our national soul.
Blaming people’s problems on the tool they use is poor form.
People would most likely have the same problems with something else, had gambling not been there.
People with addictive tendencies will become addicted to something, no matter what we do. People who lose houses and are suicidal etc etc will find some vice which fills their needs. Alcohol. Sports gambling. Drugs. MMO gaming. Sex. Whatever it is, people who have problems will find something to destroy their lives with.
Gambling was around before the USA and will be around after the USA. It has nothing to do with our national soul.
We (our family) enjoy casinos*, have for decades. Just went to Tunica for the first time – and found some of them enjoyable, and others fairly lame. I fail to see how spending $400 taking my family to a Casino is any worse than spending $400 taking my family to an NFL game or spending $400 taking my family to an amusement park. If we all enjoy ourselves, then we met our objectives.
Casinos and their related industries employ a lot of people – so it’s not like all that money just disappears out of the economy. In addition, the tourism boost related to casinos also employ lots of people.
One thing about the South… All for freedom and liberty unless you want to do something different than me – then it’s wrong…
*My only beef with Casinos is they are so smokey inside… If casinos really want to allow everyone to smoke everywhere they want to – the casinos really should install better air filtration…
“People with addictive tendencies will become addicted to something, no matter what we do.”
Got any verifiable data to back that up? Seems like “poor form” to make broad assertions without citing a source. I have a few anecdotes that contradict that statement if you’d like to swap horror stories.