The “politics of destruction” practiced by elected officials seems tame when compared to public employees themselves.
It’s hard to reach any other conclusion after watching AFSCME’s over-the-top slash and burn campaign relentlessly attacking Memphis City Councilman Kemp Conrad and the internal power struggle inside Memphis Police Department as the old guard tries to wound new Police Director Toney Armstrong with death by a thousand pin pricks.
A few weeks ago, Mr. Armstrong was attacked for getting rid of some upper echelon people in favor of creating his own team, something pretty much standard for someone taking on new leadership responsibilities and implementing his own plans. This week, it’s the unnamed sources’ reports that he was abolishing the undercover unit, a report denied by the Administration. Undoubtedly, next week, it will be something else.
More than anything, it reminds us of a dysfunctional family who attacks the normal person that dares call out the dysfunction. There are hard-core elements in the police department who labor under the opinion that they can mount a barrage of criticism that will soften Memphis Mayor A C Wharton’s support for his new director.
The Theme
We understand it is having just the opposite effect and the Wharton Administration is committed even more fully to changing things and improving operations at Memphis Police Department. We suspect that’s why the most recent complaints about Mr. Armstrong were answered by Chief Administration Officer George Little. It was a way of sending a message.
If there is a developing theme to the drama at MPD, it is that every leak and anonymous story seems to center on an alleged grievance to some ally, friend, or family member of former director Larry Godwin, now deputy commissioner for the State of Tennessee Department of Safety and Homeland Security. The state department is headed up by Commissioner Bill Gibbons of Memphis, former District Attorney General of Shelby County.
We can’t imagine that Mr. Gibbons is pleased that his deputy commissioner is commenting to the media about changes being made by Director Armstrong. After all, it’s essentially now tantamount to state government getting involved in law enforcement of local government. But just as Mr. Gibbons and Mr. Godwin are putting together their own team in Nashville, we think Mr. Armstrong deserves the same opportunity here.
There’s nothing wrong with having a debate about policing in Memphis – and we are excited to hear that Mr. Armstrong is a devotee of community policing – but that’s much different than what is taking place at Memphis Police Department. It’s also why the news media should be much more suspicious of taking information from unnamed MPD sources – such as the report denied by the Administration that the undercover unit is being disbanded – and building a news article that largely parrots these people’s view of the world.
No Sacred Cows
It’s been shown in the past that things can get personal quickly in the Memphis Police Department, but the grumbling and unsourced articles do nothing quite as much as to demonstrate how much change is needed.
Then, there’s the bomb-throwing by AFSCME officials, and even those of us who recognize Memphis sanitation workers as heroes of the civil rights movement know that the campaign against Councilman Conrad made the conversation coarser and relationships weaker.
The thing is that the councilman’s questions about potential savings from managed competition were completely legitimate, and there can’t be any argument that the structural problems of city government complicate the options in the budget processes. In the end, each year’s budget process becomes more and more selecting the best option from a list of poor ones.
As Mayor Wharton said, he has never gone through a budget process more difficult than this one. But this year’s experience will become a yearly event unless serious analysis is done and that there are no sacred cows when it comes to considering ways to save the public’s money. We don’t just mean sanitation services, but every service provided by City of Memphis. We may decide that no one can provide the service better than the current department or we may decide that there is not enough savings or increased productivity to justify it, but we do deserve to see all the facts and figures.
AFSCME’s strategy was to scream the loudest so nobody else could be heard, but that’s not going to work for long. The budgets are getting tougher and tougher and the sanitation workers need to be part of the solutions rather than being seen as part of the problem.
Savings Options
As we’ve written before, we think there are areas as ripe for reevaluation as sanitation services, but it’s hard to defend the present system which makes too little use of more efficient, modern trucks and new ways to reduce manpower.
Eighty percent of U.S. cities outsource services and that includes Memphis, which has done it for years. The godfather of managed competition, deputy mayor of New York and former Indianapolis mayor Steven Goldsmith pointed out some of the ones that worked best: “The city (Indianapolis) outsourced its wastewater treatment functions to achieve cost savings estimated at $65 million, or 42 percent, between 1994 and 1998. In addition, the project improved quality and increased capacity with fewer staff. The city outsourced its airport management as a way to promote economic development. The project reportedly generated $105 million in cost savings or new revenues between 1995 and 2004, representing a 28 percent savings over government provided services.
“In addition, the project increased retail selection and quality for passengers. Indianapolis also outsourced the maintenance of streets and attained cost savings estimated at $700,000, or 30 percent, between 1992 and 1996. Further, the outsourcing led to an increase in crew productivity and in the number of lane miles repaired. In yet another outsourcing venture, the city outsourced its audio-visual and microfilm services which produced approximately $1.5 million in cost savings between 1992 and 1995, representing a 54 percent savings over government provided services.
“In addition, the project eliminated a substantial backlog of service requests and improved service to citizens. Finally, the city chose to outsource vehicle maintenance which saved an estimated $4.2 million, or 21 percent, between 1995 and 1997. In addition, the project led to fewer labor grievances and a decrease in the cost of workers’ compensation claims.”
A Test of Maturity
Managed competition gives public employees, along with private companies, the opportunity to respond to requests for new ways for delivering public services, and in about 70% of the cases, employees win. After all, they know the services best, and often, they know best where to save money – often with the elimination of unnecessary layers of management.
But back to Councilman Conrad, it’s hard to think of a responsibility more important for someone in his position that to challenge conventional thinking, to prod new ideas for old services, and to suggest ways to increase efficiency.
If Councilman Conrad wasn’t reverential enough, we don’t believe it’s because he doesn’t appreciate the historic role of the sanitation workers, but it’s worth remembering that he wasn’t even born in 1968 – and neither was about two-thirds of Memphians. We need to keep the story of courage and sacrifice alive, because at a time when the sanitation workers had everything to lose, they put their lives and their livelihoods on the line for the equality of future generations.
That said, the attacks by AFSCME went beyond the standards of reasonableness, even in the highly charged budget environment. The name-calling, the unsubstantiated rumors, and the threats have no place in a mature city, and hopefully, that’s a description that applies to Memphis.
Reverse Consequences
The press conference called by AFSCME Monday was more demagoguery than anything else, and the resurrection of former Memphis Mayor Henry Loeb in an attempt to tar and feather Councilman Conrad was more comical than controversial.
In the end, AFSCME did its members no favors, because there was never a realistic chance that managed competition for sanitation services would be in the budget. But the shrill outcry won them no friends and may actually have put managed competition on the table in the future.
Since you have ties with Wharton it is a bit hard to not think that this editorial is somehow coming from his office or at least was suggested to you by either Bobby White or A C himself as a bit of damage control. That being said – no one questions a new police director making changes when things are not working. However Godwin had the MPD on a strong foundation including the undercover program that yes, is being dismantled, no matter how you want to slice it. Armstrong is taking the MPD in the wrong direction in that he is going back to the way things were 10-15 years ago. Commnunity policing is all nice and wonderful for the neighbors when crime is under control but in reality it does not work to keep crime down. It is a feel good program that is a failure all across the country. Crime began to go down in Memphis and in other parts of the country when police agencies went back to being police officers and not camp counselors. Instead of being excited about going back to community policing you should be concerned. Memphis is too fragile right now to return to programs that did not work years ago. I, for one, am not optimistic about Toney Armstrong’s ability to lead the MPD and I have known him and worked with him for years. Nice guy. Just not at the level of competence he needs to be in order to be effective.
Even more disturbing is the vise-grip that the public sector unions have over our city. There just aren’t enough knowledgeable people left in the city to fight them off.
Anonymous: You live in a dream world. We have never been asked to write anything by anybody in City Hall, and considering some of the things that we’ve written, it’s pretty clear that we’ve called it like we see it when it comes to all of city government. But thanks for your comments.
Mayors, Police Chiefs Turn Spotlight On Success Of Community Policing
Mayors, police chiefs and other top municipal and law enforcement officials from 35 cities will assemble in Las Vegas July 22 for a roundtable review of the contribution that community policing has made to the reduction of crime and violence across the nation over the past several years, and an open discussion of some of the community policing initiatives that have been most effective.
Community policing is an approach in which police, community residents and other stakeholders work together to define community needs and implement crime prevention strategies. This approach has been gaining popularity in law enforcement circles for many years, and the passage of comprehensive anti-crime legislation and the creation of the Office of Community Oriented Policing Services (COPS) in 1994 resulted in the adoption of the concept by over 12,000 police departments and agencies of all sizes and the hiring and training of thousands of new community officers and law enforcement support personnel. The U.S. Conference of Mayors has been monitoring the expansion of community policing and documenting its successes; the Las Vegas conference gives mayors and police chiefs an opportunity to compare their experiences, exchange information, and discuss the future of community policing in cities as well as the future of the federal COPS program.
The 75 local officials traveling to Las Vegas represent cities ranging in size from over 1.5 million – Philadelphia – to 10,000 – Los Lunas, New Mexico. The Mayor of New Orleans, Marc H. Morial, will preside during the event; Mayor Morial was elected President of The U.S. Conference of Mayors at the organization’s annual meeting last month in Detroit. He will be joined by New Orleans Police Chief Richard Pennington in an opening presentation on their City’s experience with community policing. Reno Mayor Jeff Griffin and Police Chief Jerry Hoover will appear with them to describe the impact that community policing has had on crime in their City, as will Denver Mayor Wellington E. Webb and Police Chief Jerry Whitman.
“Community policing has had a dramatic, positive effect on America’s communities,” according to Mayor Morial. “It has forged a partnership between the police and residents that is helping to reduce crime and build stronger neighborhoods. The U.S. Conference of Mayors, through the Mayors’ Institute for Community Policing, supported by The U.S. Department of Justice COPS Office, continues to advocate the principles of community policing and believes that it has a strong role to play in fostering and institutionalizing the growing community policing movement in cities across the nation.”
A working session on “Lessons Learned from Community Policing” will include presentations by Saint Paul Mayor Norm Coleman, Tulsa Mayor Susan Savage, and Richmond (VA) Police Chief Jerry Oliver, and open discussion among all attendees. A luncheon session will be addressed by Jack Calhoun, Executive Director of the National Crime Prevention Council.
In the afternoon, a working session on “Sustaining and Building Upon Community Policing Successes” will include presentations by Richmond (CA) Mayor Rosemary Corbin, Madison (WI) Police Chief Richard Williams, and Charleston (SC) Police Chief Reuben Greenberg, and open discussion. Philadelphia Police Commissioner John Timoney is scheduled to discuss his City’s community policing experiences at the close of the afternoon session.
The Conference of Mayors publications to be released in Las Vegas include 1) results of a national survey on the overall impact of community policing in cities; 2) “best practices” involving neighborhood-level initiatives; 3) case studies of successful programs in Lincoln (NE), Anaheim, and Miami-Dade County; and 4) “best practices” involving collaboration of police and other city agencies.
An opening reception for the mayors and police chiefs participating in the Las Vegas conference will be held Saturday evening at the Four Seasons Hotel, the site of the event. The conference will be opened Sunday morning by Clark County Sheriff Jerry Keller.
The Las Vegas conference and the reports released are supported by funding from The U.S. Department of Justice Office of Community Oriented Policing Services (COPS).
Anybody that knows much about you guys is that you’ve got ties with a lot of people on all sides.
Regardless, if we could buy Godwin for what he’s worth and sell him for what he thinks he’s worth, we’d be millionaires.
Community policing may not be the right answer for every city. However, for a city such as Memphis where mistrust of police runs rampant through our neighborhoods, community policing may be the ONLY answer.
You are right about community policing not being right for every city. It did not work here under the following police directors: Burgess, Crews, Winfrey, Bolden and Godwin. They all tried various applications of the community policing concept and crime did not go down no matter how many things they tried. Not midnight basketball, not Leaders of Tomorrow in Westwood, not bbq dinners or senior citizen breakfasts. The officers assigned to the COACT units were a waste of taxpayer monies. It was not until Godwin put them to work as part of Blue Crush did crime go down in this city. Yes, it may work in other cities but unless Toney has some magic new way to implement it that no director before him has thought of it will fail. And he will, too. Wharton made a mistake picking Toney to lead the MPD at a time when Memphis and this mayor need a strong no nonsense crime fighter. Godwin had his faults and his detractors but he led the MPD to national and international prominence.
Nobody seems to quote the facts about City sanitation. Lots of stuff about other cities, just nothing about reality here.
They serve 177,000+ homes every week. They pick up virtually everything you put on the street. The provide free recycle service and junk pick up, all for $25 a month. They bring in about 50 million a year to run their operation. The City’s own budget numbers show a surplus in funds that operate the service.
AFSME says they have no problem with side load trucks and the City has bought a few. Who kept repeating the lie that the City was cowed into not buying the side load trucks?
This service works pretty good. AFSME did not have to sling mud and I am sorry they did so. I believe they can stand on their record of giving good service for a good price.
Larry:
You are right. Sell your strengths and your own story rather than attacking those with another opinion.
As we wrote, 70% of managed competitions are “won” by employees. We are planning to write more about ways that the current sanitation workers could be set up in their own “enterprise company” so that they share in whatever savings they create. Part of the problem, we are told, with the $25 fee is that it does not cover all the costs of the service, but that said, if we were mayor, we’d set up the “enterprise company” without any competitive process and give the workers a couple of years to show how systems can be improved. We bet on the workers.
Thanks for the comments.
The problem with any talk regarding crime going down under Larry Godwin fails to point out that in Godwin’s first 3 years crime in the city of Memphis skyrocketed. When Godwin speaks of the fewest murder numbers he’s simply using a false number to dispute the actual 25 year low that occured in 2004 under the direction of James Bolden. Godwin’s claim to fame was the first time in 25 years the city’s murder number dipped below 100.
http://www.wmctv.com/story/13679596/memphis-may-achieve-lowest-murder-rate-in-30-years?clienttype=printable
When in fact the number dipped below 100 back in 2004 under the direction of James Bolden. Page 38 of this 2007 District Attorney report released by Bill Gibbons back in clearly shows the city had 94 murders in 2004, which happened to be Bolden’s last year as police director. The following year Larry Godwin takes over and that number jumps to 136.
http://www.scdag.com/Portals/0/annualreport/ar2007.pdf
The murder number rose to 149 in 2006 and 163 in 2007. Therefore, when Larry Godwin speaks of reducing crime in Memphis he in fact has attempted to skew numbers to bring them back to what they were in 2004 before he became police director. How do you explain crime numbers reportedly dropping under Godwin, yet the numbers show during his first 3 years are director crime skyrocketed. Godwin simply allowed the media to tell his tale and many of you have taken it as fact.
Any person that says community policing doesn’t work is misguided, considering the last police director who emphasized community policing helped curb violent crime and implement programs that were immediately elimintated by Larry Godwin. Godwin’s elimination of community policing and implementation of community lockup coincided with a metoric rise in violent crime.
There are certainly more reports that dispute the numbers released by Godwin. However, unless reputable media outlets do their homework, citizens will continue to believe that crime has drastically improved in Memphis when in fact, Memphis was a safer city in 2004. We should be comparing decade to decade and not last year vs. this year. Smartcitymemphis please look into the district attorney reports and provide a decade worth of analysis that either provides support for community policing or suggest it hasn’t worked in Memphis, TN.
As I noted in my public comments on the final budget Tuesday night, the acrimony and us versus them attitudes of all parties involved are a disservice to our City. Unfortunately, I was at the County Commission with my ringer off waiting to do what I could to defend OECY and Shelby Farms Monday when AFSCME called to ask my advice about going after the Loeb garage, which I support despite my misgivings about tax increment financing. The problem is that we rarely look at the big picture and fail to recognize the synergies of the challenges facing us and instead focus on spot fires and push button issues piece meal.
The benchmark for Godwin of 2006 was set by the Memphis Shelby Crime Commission when Operation: Safe Community began. Here is their latest report info for the first part of this year compared to the same time period in 2006. It will be interesting to see if the trends hold under Armstrong:
City of Memphis Crime Update: January – March 2011
From January 1-March 31, 2011, Major Violent Crime was down 25.6% including a drop in robbery by 46.9% and a drop in aggravated assault by 12.0% across the City of Memphis, when compared to the same time period in 2006.
Major Property Crime was down 33.9% including a drop in burglary by 29.8% and a drop in motor vehicle theft by 59.5% across the City of Memphis, when compared to the same time period in 2006.
Shelby County Crime Update: January – March 2011
From January 1-March 31, 2011, Major Violent Crime was down 25.2% including a drop in murder by 25.0% and a drop in aggravated assault by 12.1% across all jurisdictions of Shelby County, when compared to the same time period in 2006.
Major Property Crime was down 34.7% including a drop in burglary by 30.5% and a drop in motor vehicle theft by 59.0% across all jurisdictions of Shelby County, when compared to the same time period in 2006.
To view the full Operation: Safe Community Monthly Crime Trend Report administered by The University of Memphis and the Memphis Shelby Crime Commission please click HERE.
In 2008, the Memphis Shelby Crime Commission developed an integral partnership with the University of Memphis’ Center for Community Criminology and Research (C3R). Through this partnership, the Crime Commission is able to secure and provide the citizens of Memphis and Shelby County with up-to-date crime trend analysis for our community.
These crime trends and statistics are a vital component in measuring the effectiveness of the Memphis Shelby Crime Commission 5-year crime reduction initiative, Operation: Safe Community which began in 2006. Crime statistics and updates are systematically compared to 2006 as a benchmark for success towards full implementation of the 5-year plan.