The following column is by longtime urban commentator Neal Peirce:
The budget imbroglio seizing Congress (and most state legislatures) throws an ominous shadow over America’s cities and towns — and their people.
It’s time for our local governments, which deal day-to-day with the impacts of rising needs and insufficient revenues, to roar back with indignation and a demand fresh thinking.
The grassroots America that’s famously advertised for its strong communities is on the fiscal ropes. And it will be hurt even more deeply by many of the budget cuts now being voted.
It’s easier to excuse governors and state legislatures with balanced budget requirements, grappling with the grim impact of recession-undermined revenues and fast escalating health costs.
But the Republican Congress and President Obama, their differences notwithstanding, deserve failing grades for focusing all their budget-cutting efforts on the 15 percent of the federal budget accounted for by non-defense discretionary spending.
The result has been a carnival of knife-wielding that may get even worse with the next fiscal year. While massive farm subsidies are left intact, we’re in danger of shrinking or killing programs that provide some relief from poverty, assist public transit and Amtrak, underwrite Head Start and parts of college tuitions, support the Legal Services Corporation, family planning counsel and technology innovation programs.
Other targets include the new, extraordinarily competitive TIGER (for transportation) and Sustainable Communities (housing-environment-transportation) grant programs. The knife may also terminate the Hope VI public housing program with its signature achievements in substituting economically integrated and stable neighborhoods in place of high-rise, poverty-laden, crime-battered projects.
Of special concern to mayors is the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG), program, destined for termination by the House Republicans.
Minneapolis Mayor R.T. Ryback makes the point that flexible funding CDBG allows is used differently in different communites– “And that’s the whole point, to respond to special local needs and encourage innovation, based on the judgment of local officials ‘most in touch.’”
In the case of Minneapolis, Ryback notes, the block grants have covered initiatives ranging from bio-terrorism protections to anti-foreclosure counselling to helping prevent kids’ exposure to lead. The city’s also used CDBG to fund a youth-violence prevention initiative that’s cut back significantly on juvenile crime. And it’s also enabled a Neighborhood Employment Network that’s moved 12,000 people into decent-paying jobs through a set of community-based providers.
With city budgets “devastated” by state funding cuts, the assistance is needed more than ever, Ryback contends, adding: “It’s ironic that those who say they don’t want Washington controlling their lives are voting to take away the sole source — CDBG — where there’s local control of federal dollars.”
Arguably, the issue goes a lot deeper: It’s the danger of budget cuts stripping a range of federal activities to keep our communities strong and viable, even while vastly bigger parts of the federal budget escape deep scrutiny.
To read more, click here.
De-fund war, refund community.
Amen, Scott. If some people get to say they don’t want their tax money going to NPR, why don’t we have the choice to say we don’t want ours to go to missiles?
without missiles you might not have “community”
get real, step out of your ivory dome
Yes, because had it not been for the Iraq war, Memphis and the United States would certainly have been detroyed by now.
the mere fact of HAVING missiles increases the odds of my NOT being destroyed. My survivability quotient increases having thet missiles, I can choose to use them or not use them, and not be held hostage to bumbling academic pundits wearing rose colored glasses, all the while believing the world is a safe place where Americans are loved and adored for our intelligent, fair and reasonable philosophic ergo naive view of threats..
I think I’ll buy another gun too….especially living and driving around Memphis..Memphis has the capability to ‘destroy’ itself if you’ve noticed in the last 20 years..
‘smokem if you gottem’
lock-n-load fellas, a love my mac9, moss/riot, czechAk, AR, and my 7V2
Yes, the American Empire would probably be indefensible without a very high expenditure on military defense. But in the guns vs. butter debate, I believe we should pare back the spending on guns. America will survive as a nation. Empires always (repeat ALWAYS) fall at some point. Ours will too.
Packrat: You’re so right, and how often does history show us that nations that expanded their military might too far and spent excessively eventually capsized the very nation they were allegedly protecting.
If we’re not an empire, our military spread out all over the world protecting economic interests of our corporations (and in many cases, corporations not even based in the U.S.) sure as hell makes us look a lot like one. And the financial effect is exactly the same as an empire.
You do know, that the vast majority of the Founding Fathers were adamantly opposed to huge standing armies and foreign military committments and entanglments.
It’s hardly inaccurate to call a spade a spade.
Anon-
We would use the term American Hegemony, but many do not know how to pronounce “hegemony”. “Empire” is more recognized, understood and its enunciation is more widely known.
One thing we Democrats are is consistent! Whether it’s sexual harrassment on the job, closing Gitmo, opposing war in the Middle East, or railing aginst the deficit like SCM used to do … well, ok, bad examples, but the point is we’re consistent! We’re outraged at the Libya bombing! We’re outraged that the president didn’t consult Congress! We’re appalled at the pictures of American soldiers with dead Afghani civilians (although granted, you’ll have to look hard to find that one-day story in today’s newspaper; cause it’s only REALLY an outrage when the soldiers are taunting LIVE COMBATANTS instead).
We’re outraged all over again, because one thing we are is consistent, and not just smug political opportunists! Right?
Who said anyone here is a Democrat?
all empires might be a hegemony
all hegemony doesn’t necessarily constitute empire building
I again bet NONE of you have served this country…
especially knowitall architects..if so, say so, if not say so as well
America is no empire,
No sissybois please
Semper Fi !
Saying it doesn’t make it so, nosissyboi. I’m sorry you’re unwilling to look at the hard truth.
DC,
Noting your history of comments on these pages and the many names you have assumed- at points purposely posing as different authors in order to portray some sort of support for your opinions- your credibility as well as any credentials you offer hold little value and thus I feel no obligation to offer my own (military and otherwise). The more desperate your attempts to discredit the individuals here along with their ideas, the more obvious your shortcomings are so please continue to flail about- you do far more damage to your positions than any of us possibly could employing simple truths and hard facts.
Man, lol….my opinions really do bug you don’t they ? lol
otherwise you would ignore them, right ?
Are you serious ? You think most posters are worried about your assessment of whether someone is building CREDIBILITY or displaying ‘credentials’ on a public access WEBSTIE ???
Surely, that’s oen of the funniest and most odd things I’ve ever read on a public access WEBSITE !!
Few rational people are concerned about establishing ‘credibility’ on the NET….perhaps only fully entralled, easily agitated posters like YOU.
ha ha ha
Someone would be an idiot to worry about whether YOU view a person’s anonymous participation on a BLOG as CREDIBLE .
Get real, pal….it’s the NET !
shekel, your Marine drill sergeant is calling. You’re dishonorably discharged for lying about actually having any service record, lol.