Previously posted April 3, 2009:
My morning commute delivers me many days to downtown Memphis from the Riverside Drive exit of I-40. It’s the antithesis of the experience that greets me two miles away south when I enter downtown from the other end of Riverside Drive off I-55.
There, the spectacular view of the river and downtown unfailingly lifts my spirit and evokes my pride in our city. Meanwhile, the other end of Riverside Drive is unwelcoming, shabby and depressing.
It is a rare day that I don’t drive onto Riverside from the north that I don’t think of the Memphis Art Park. Coupled with a skate park on Mud Island, it has the power to redefine a riverfront desperately in need of vibrancy and to shake off the pervasive feeling of lethargy that greets visitors.
Turning Around
Beale Street Landing is an important piece in the puzzle and will change things at the foot of Beale, but in its own way, Memphis Art Park’s opportunity to shake up the area between Union and Floyd Alley and Front and Riverside has equal potential. After all, most visitors to Memphis end up in this area looking at the most photographed location in our city – the Mississippi River.
They look eagerly for something to do – even if it’s just to buy a Coke or ice cream and enjoy the view. Often, they’re looking for anything to pass the time while they wait for a riverfront trolley whose posted schedule is irrelevant. (Q: When will the next trolley arrive? A: When you see it coming.) The idea of eating lunch in a restaurant where they can view the river is as alien as the Riverfront Development Corporation and Friends of our Riverfront issuing joint press releases.
Visitors are looking for something interesting to do – an activity, something with the opportunity for a personal experience, something that offers them the feeling of doing something special or finding something unexpected in a city know for its creativity but that often works hard to keep it under wraps.
When Memphis decided to turn its back on the river, it did so with a vengeance. But that’s a common tale for cities on American rivers. Riverfronts were rowdy, dirty and commercial, so cities didn’t place much value on them as iconic landmarks or competitive platforms for the future. They were simply ignored.
The Wrong Message
But we know better now. So it’s nothing short of astounding that the northern entrance to Riverside remains as dismal today as it did 30 years ago.
Driving off I-40, we are greeted with chain link fences that do little except to send the message that this must be a city with a lot of crime and little design ethos. The chain link fence on the west lines a parking lot and the chain link fence on the east follows the trolley line (and makes visitor’s walk from the Welcome Center to the Mud Island tram circuitous and indirect).
If this entrance into downtown is anything, it is a juxtaposition, killing the chance for a strong first impression.
Across from the Tennessee Welcome Center is an austere, crumbling oatmeal-colored, bunker-like parking garage whose better days are long past, and a large motor home seems perpetually parked there. There’s brief respite passing between Confederate and Jefferson Davis Parks, and about the same time that Mud Island comes into view on the right, there’s promising work taking place on the left as the old Custom House is being converted into the University of Memphis law school (and thanks to the Hyde Family Foundations, the face to the river is being made greener and more attractive).
Eyesores
But the boost doesn’t last long. Immediately past it are the ignored rear of the old Cossitt Library, another godawful garage facing the river and a parking lot and more fencing behind the first station – all of which would be transformed by Memphis Art Park. Finally, at Union and Riverside, where you expect a breath-taking experience, the high ground – Wagner Place – is lined with commercial garbage dumpsters and hundreds of parking spaces where green space and seating overlooking the river would be gifts to downtown.
Greater momentum for elimination of the prevailing ugliness on this section of the riverfront should be a cause that all of us could rally around. For now, we’ll start with Memphis Art Park.
Its creator, John Kirkscey, reminds us about what’s best about Memphis: the ability of one person with a dream and an entrepreneurial and creative spirit to inspire others to rally around him. Already, the Center City Commission has expressed support for the Art Park, joining an awful lot of people who live and work downtown and who work and enjoy our arts and culture scene.
The $30 million project would transform the heart of the riverfront (which dearly needs it), and it would become the most visited, most vibrant place in a downtown (which dearly needs it). A few years ago, when CEOs for Cities asked corporate CEOs what they most wanted out of a city, they said vibrancy.
Something Better
Unfortunately, vibrancy in downtown Memphis is few and far between, pretty much centered in the area of Beale Street, and it generally cranks up about the time that many people are going down for the night. Memphis Art Park would become another important anchor of vibrancy as the fire station, the parking garage and the Cossitt Library became a beehive of creativity, contributing to a culture of creativity that cities need today to succeed.
There are places for emerging artists, musicians, dancers, actors and filmmakers who could be celebrated and enjoyed. In Mr. Kirkscey’s words, “Memphis Arts Park would be a cultural beacon on our city’s doorstep and announce that Memphis is a distinctive arts destination.”
His conceptual plans – fleshed out by David Schuermann and Joey Hagan of Architecture, Incorporated and Coleman Coker of Building Studio of New Orleans – call for rehabilitating the library into a multi-purpose arts facility, including studios, film rooms, music rooms, gallery/exhibition/event space and a community arts resource center. It would also have a sculpture garden overlooking the river.
Best of all, the Art Park reimagines the Monroe garage so that it has murals, lighting, colored scrims, a green rooftop park and art plaza and a pedestrian bluff walk. Finally, the fire station headquarters – which has been slated for replacement by City of Memphis Fire Services – would become a community cinema, a performance venue, gallery and event space and a plaza for outdoor events. There also would be a grand staircase and fountain at Union and Riverside.
Planning The Dream
Fortunately, Mr. Kirkscey and his advocates are remaining nimble so alternates are being considered and suggestions are being welcomed. Already, a number of local organizations have expressed their interest in being part of the project, and hopefully, local government and local philanthropies will join hands to jump start the project.
To his credit, Mr. Kirkscey is doing more than offering up a dream. He has developed a 60-page plan complete with design ideas, costing, architectural renderings, operational philosophy and examples of successful similar projects in other cities.
At this point, we need to admit that we have a personal bias in this issue. Our office is a half block from the river on Union and faces the moribund fire station and the concrete walls that meet the sidewalk beside it.
It would be so good that when visitors to Memphis walking down Union to the river ask us what they can do, we could point across the street to a lively, active art park that reflects the best of what our city has to offer.
The fact that this was posted in April 2009, and it’s two years later should tell you volumes.
Change in Memphis is snail-like, and it always has been and will always be. Step out of the dream, pal.
Wake up please, I have understood since I moved here that Memphis has no where to go and all day to get there, when compared to progressive cities. If it did, you would not have the need to re-post a 2 year old ‘personal vision’.
LOL
We can only hope that Memphis has turned a corner and perhaps with Wharton at the helm, projects will start to move again. Guess we’ll know by how this project moves in the next two years eh?
We live in the real world where important projects take time. It’s better to be right than fast.
Compared to many other cities, projects move faster here because there is greater accessibility and unlike many cities, projects don’t need to have the stamp of approval of a power structure as in Nashville.
Thirty million for an arts park? In our case it might as well be 300 million! I like the concept and professional presentation but not the location. I prefer the south Main arts district or Midtown. Folks, we can’t even afford to fix the sidewalks downtown!
As we have said repeatedly, great cities have to do more than a few things at the same time. We think this is the right place for the most economic impact and for bringing vibrancy to a dead and critical part of downtown – on the street where most of the tourists walk to the river, shake their heads for lack of activities, and walk back to their hotels.
Well, perhaps so, but Memphis can hardly be ranked as a “Great City” ? right ? , by what convention ? by what objective or even subjective measure ??
I agree, truly GREAT cities have to, and can do a few things at a time, but the coarse reality is that there are more pressings things to get accomplished (well yes even fixing sidewalks downtown).
Another dumb city move in my opinion.
I was debating with some friends recently about the potential site for the proposed Eggleston Museum. I was terribly frustrated that Downtown was not in the discussion. I think cultural destinations deserve to be in prominent/celebrated locations, close to one another and walking distance to hotels. This is best for them, for visitors and the city… visually but more important economically.
Could it be possible to help these two proposals come together? I think it A) would be a wonderful fit, B) eliminate duplication of efforts and C) shave costs from both projects and D) make for a much better project by concentrating like uses in one place.
Aaron,
I agree per the reference to leadership change at city hall. We might simply assign Art Park in the city’s project backlog and see where we are able to go over the next 2 years.
As the various stakeholders are pulled together, there might in fact more shared purpose than the surface of this proposal suggests as no doubt Mr. Kirkscey is aware. For example, issues regarding the seismic standards at the downtown fire station that could be resolved by relocating this service to a new facility elsewhere. After all, the building is dated and the standards used in the construction of a fire house are necessarily above and beyond what might be required elsewhere- it’s not enough that the structure survive intact, it must remain fully functional immediately following any seismic event. This could open the space for at least part of the planned park. The Library system has apparently considered shuttering Cossitt in the past due to low utilization. As downtown continues to mature as a neighborhood, there might be a need both current and future for a public library branch, but this could just as easily occupy a space elsewhere downtown sized for the local population and occupying higher profile street frontage where it could prove as something as an economic windfall for a block- perhaps a space along Madison or Main (The DeLuxe Arcade building on Madison comes to mind). The project is definitely doable and will no doubt benefit from the recent relocation of the Memphis College of Art graduate program to South Main and the Visible School’s new facility on Madison.
On another note… arts aside… Is it possible that we already have WAY too much park space to maintain/support/pay for today? For a population our size, I think we have an enormous amount of public space that goes unprogrammed and is not kept in acceptable condition.
I have lamented before the locked bathroom problem at Overton and the disgraceful care of both grounds and monuments and facilities throughout our city’s public realm. There is only so much money to go around. How do we build park projects within sight of other underused park project?
I agree that IF we are going to tackle the promenade, it should be an extraordinary destination. But I would like the context to include how this fits with the larger picture we face. As well, some thought into connectivity, long-term programming/management, financial support and needed use mix beyond the arts-park is key. We can’t just build another thing and walk away.
John,
The timing of our posts kept me from seeing yours until after I had submitted. I think that is a superb suggestion.
The fact that much of the ground floor space along Front between Union and Monroe is underutilized gives the project a public financial benefit angle as well. There are numerous potential retail scenarios that would benefit from being located in such close proximity to such a facility- cafes, galleries, supply stores and even additional museum spaces that would benefit from the visitors drawn by the proximity of such attractions. To truly reap the maximum rewards for such an investment would mean including an overhaul of the pedestrian environment along the adjacent streets and blocks- rebuilding sidewalks, planting street trees, including benches and trash receptacles, better defining crosswalks and installing additional lighting.
In rebuilding these two blocks, we might also be able to provide one additional service to the area. Currently access between Riverside Drive/ Tom Lee and Front Street (Downtown) is technically not ADA compliant. The elevation change and slope it creates essentially bars anyone confined to a wheelchair from making the transition without a great deal of personal training or assistance. The potential would be there to provide a limited access public elevator to provide an ADA compliant route between the two areas- something that will only increase in value as our population continues to age.
This is an interesting conversation. Per private development, this was the intention and original proposal made by the Riverfront Development Corporation. I am not sure if the plan exists online anymore, but I have a hard copy at home. I actually see the Art Park as not adding to the inventory of true public park space downtown simply because its nature and programming might limit its utilization as such. Then again, it might just be semantics.
I have actually made that point before to one of the individuals spearheading Friends for Our Riverfront. My take was that the Promenade could support both public and private development similar to Battery Park City where a generous amount of very well developed and detailed public space was created along the waterfront while also supporting private uses. Again in Seattle, there are certain ordinances that permit developers additional square footage and uses where they provide a “public good” on their ground floors. These “goods” include elevator and escalator access to aid in traversing that downtown’s notoriously steep slopes. Generous setbacks and an elevated promenade such as the one that exists between the College of Law and Riverside (complete with a pedestrian bridge to Confederate Park), could be instituted at the ordinance/ zoning overlay level to ensure that the public’s access to these spaces is unhindered.
My point at the time was that the Promenade space as is grossly underutilized, full of inappropriate uses and for large sections is essentially inaccessible. That any improvement would be beneficial and development that actually activated the space would be of even greater value. When one looks at the neighborhood, we find several public parks and green spaces, all of which are underutilized and rarely if ever see a “healthy crowd” that is not associated with a music or bar-b-que festival, so why create more open space that will require additional maintenance and only serve to further disperse an already limited number of users? The response was basically there is never such a thing as too much open space, the vacancy rate of the surrounding neighborhood raises doubts as to the demand for new development and finally that this new space would somehow become a destination in and of itself. Their plan can be found here: http://www.friendsforourriverfront.org/2005/02/what-can-be-done-with-7-million.html
Their proposed budget of $7 million to remove the existing garages and build the park spaces they propose seems grossly underestimated, but don’t try telling them that. I got an earful in response to my comments and questions.
John:
We just wanted to say amen to your point about programming. Memphis has less parkland than our peer cities, but the problem is that we never seem to have a programming component. The Eggleston museum needs to be part of an existing facility to be successful. Hopefully, someone will revisit the possibility of being downtown, and it could be part of the Art Park for example.
Dumb: One measure is Sir Peter Hall’s seminal book, Cities in Civilization, which names Memphis as one of the 15 great cities that shaped our world. We’ve written on this previously if you are interested.
Speaking of Art Park perhaps recieving a little momentum in its favor:
http://www.commercialappeal.com/news/2011/feb/28/proposal-downtown-memphis-art-park-and-arts-center/
Cost as an issue is raised several times in the article, but as in all other things- where there is a will…
We’ve blogged for years about Rule #1 in government: There’s always money for what the mayor wants.
what seems far more elucidative is what Fulford commented on Sir Peter’s 1000 page book, with a
chapter mentioned Memphis:
‘The Memphis music business in the early 1950s was manic in its rush to churn out hits and create stars. Memphis had made something fresh and exciting, the blend of blues and country music that would soon be called rock ‘n’ roll. The city burned with ambition. …It’s typical of Sir Peter Hall that Cities in Civilization contains a chapter on music in Memphis from 1948 to 1956. Hall wants to explain what brings a city to its golden age, and he lines up Memphis beside Athens, Vienna, Los Angeles and all the other culture-shaping cities of history. He finds in Memphis one of his themes: “outsiders, coming into the city and creating something strangely new.” Memphis transformed the music of the Mississippi Delta into the dominant sound of the world…….’
My opinion is that Peter Hall is just another BRITISH planning professor steeped in academics. Anybody mentioning Memphis TN in the 1950s in the same breath as ATHENS, or LA is living in a total academic and past existence.
Lots of truly ‘great cities’ in the world have fallen.
To harp (no pun intended) on music in Memphis as some sort of fantastic greatness relects a narrow, truly BRITISH view of great societies. The Memphis of the 1950s does not make Memphis great in 2011. that’s silly, but typically English.
English planning professors who are urbanists don’t really ‘know Memphis’ at all.
As far as his theme about outsiders coming to the city [memphis] to create something ‘new’…..I find that laughable since right after the murder of Martin King…. or say around the beginning of the 1970s. Sir Peter is an nostalgic, backward-looking egghead of common variety especially the British, white variety. Anyone who has lived in Memphis in the 20th and now 21st century knows that Memphis tends to be quite insular, narrow, and even xenophobic to ‘outsiders’ in general. Local, old line good ole boys have been everything BUT welcoming to outsiders coming to Memphis to ‘create something NEW’.
Memphis might become a ‘great city’ in the future, but it has numerous hurdles to overcome to bestow any title of ‘greatness’ on itself at this present time. Only a drunken arrogant fool or a British tourist on Beale would submit such balderdash, and feckless, deliberate exageration .
We think you not only miss the whole point, but that you’re unwilling to even see the point.
We think we’ll take the lead from others on this blog and just ignore what you’re saying, since it’s all the same old stuff with no facts.
Fella, it’s OPINION , not some academic mental masterbation or scientific examination.
Are you the arbiter of truth ? facts ? At the same time when you are asked about the validity of your ‘poll’s’ applicability to the actual, factual demographics of a majority black city viz the desires and attituddes of ‘urban professionals’, you choose to avoid dealing with ‘facts’, but speciiously submit that a ‘national poll’ is somehow indicative of an accurate sampling of Memphis’ own urban young professionals.
That’s BOGUS pal.
BTW, you, et al, are under no obligation to reply to anything I choose to post in re ‘opinion’….whether it’s the ‘same old stuff’, or ‘new ‘stuff’.
Additionally, surely you must realize that opinion, need not be ‘stuffed’ with any requisite amount of ‘facts’ for YOU or any other poster.
You’re right, simply ignore the posts pal, and stop getting in a Memphis ‘visceral lather’ about different points of view that obviously anger you….that’s silly.
But if Memphis is true to form, you again will attempt to silence and censor opinion you don’t like or don’t want to hear….because again, it seems that Memphis must participate in some brand of homgenous thought.
“Great Cities” don’t have to engage in such implied requirement or edict…..unless you have not awaken from the Cotton Planatation/Bossman pecking order.
Yawhsuh Mr. Bossmane…I’s so sorry to gives you my opinion, cuz I’s don’t want to front you up. I should beez checking wit you first to git permission to have my opinion.
I knows I should neva disagree or have my own mind about Memphis BossMane, cuz youz mo edumucated, and youz know besta fo evabody heah on da Memphis Plantation.
Yep, you should ignore my factless ‘opinions’, pal.. lol…works for me.
~Dumb City INC
I’ll take a moment to respond to DC/Anon/mbmouse or whatever they are calling themselves these days-
Per the local urban young professionals: http://www.mpactmemphis.org/the-feedback-project/
If you choose to state opinion that cannot be supported by facts or opinions than it will never be taken seriously be anyone and will have no impact on the conversation, plans or actions undertaken by those around you- not that you care.
No ‘impact on the conversation, plans or actions undertaken’ ???
who’s trying to ‘impact’ YOU ? surely you’re not that impressed with yourself, are you ??
You probably believe that YOU have ‘impact’ masquerading as a ‘local expert’ ?
I’ll state this again pal, it’s OPINION. Stated opinions have a variety of effects….just look at your own flimsy retort of whining about another person’s OPINION !
Note : you’re right, I don’t care about YOUR opinion. Why ? you are entitled to your own distorted vision about what Memphis ‘needs’…you are entitled to think you are a philosopher king. If you think the vast majority of Memphis’ own black urban professionals salute your own narrow brand of ‘solutions’ for a black majority city called Memphis, TN, I would kindly submit you are dreaming, and really out of touch with the residents of the city, and what they really value.
You value things, process, sturctures that don’t ring true with the majority. All of your proclamations, pontification, and what YOU see as ‘leadership’, rings hollow and weak to the vast majority of Memphis’ citizens, and particularly so in the Black Community.
You should perhaps re-evaluate your ‘projection’ (read imposition) of your own values, upon those you think that need your brand of wisdom, pal. Get out more and talk to BLACK majority urban professionals, not white, self-serving architects, developers, and college professors who teach ‘urban planning’.
The world you live in, is not the world in which most Memphians reside. That’s only rolling around in your own head. Have you actually considered that many of your values and/or solutions just might be inappropriate for the majority of Memphis citizens ?? No, probably not…lol…you’re too blinded by your own light it seems, and have become a victim of your own bullshit that you have been expressing all over different websites fro several years now based on the true record.
Got it yet ?……my OPINION…again. There is no need to be so frustrated with posters who don’t buy into your ‘vision’, brand of logic, or urban ‘philosophy’ when attempting to solve MAJOR problems in the faces of most Memphians (majority black not white), each and every day.
My opinion, is that Memphians need the establish a strong foundation in the basics which make a community flourish OVER TIME. That strong foundation has little to do with your alleged academic renderings, exposes, and obvious zeal about ‘architecture’ or other ‘elements’ of preoccupation with ‘physical Memphis’.
A strong future of Memphis shall be built on the souls and character of individuals, and the development of their minds in the context of the community. And please don’t tell me ‘we can do both’…..perhaps, but neither very well if our priorities are in architecture and bogus planning.
Here’s something for you : get in in your head, pal…I need not agree with you, or anyone else about how to focus and SOLVE a few of the MAJOR problems facing the majority of Memphians, or anyone else.
I do know this: Memphis should stop fooling itself. Memphis has to re-tool…address educational deficiencies (#1), address dysfucntional family life, attract capital for job formation, educate its workforce. Stop/challenge racism and prejudice at every turn when it raises its head.
When we do that, THEN we can ‘afford’ to prioritize other growth opportunities..intelligently together.
Go invest your ‘wisdom’ with children, students in grade or high school, and spend less time on the freaking web attempting to ‘HAVE AN IMPACT ON THE CONVERSATION’ on the damn websites on which you seem to be omnipresent 24/7
pal.
I’m fine. I have every right to an expressed opinion. That opinion should not be held hostage to the alleged leadership that you actually believe that you provide.
No one is trying to convince you. This is not a battle of wits or acdemic theories…nor is it a contest for ‘readership’ on Smart City Memphis.
BTW
your survey done by MPACTMemphis was done with the VAST majority of WHITE participating residents of Shelby County and Memphis…
One thing I found interesting as well, is that almost 50% of the participants stated Memphis was NOT the city they would most prefer to live in at this point in their own lives.
71 % also stated that they DISAGREE with the statement that all races are treated equally and fairly…
Yeah buddy…Now how about solving the true problems first (again, in my opinion…lol)
You spend a great deal of time writing a considering you do not care what I think or what my opinion might be.
If you really are trying to debunk the information that MPACT provides or want anyone to believe that you hold the key to what “black urban professionals” in Memphis truly want, you would offer up more than your opinion. Show us facts, provide information that can be referenced. Otherwise, you are simply taking up space.
Sorry, meant to say “…writing a response considering…” in the first line.
Show US ??? who the heck is “us” ?? white urban architects/planners?
you are the one who “referenced” MPACT memphis’ survey, and the survey was taken showing the vast majority of participants as WHITE, in a MAJORITY black urban population….perhaps you don’t see or acknowledge the signicance or such a disparity…lol…I DO
If a survey’s participants are WHITE in a majority BLACK city, it doesn’t take a mental giant to understand that the resultant ‘opinions’ might be SKEWED….lol……DUH….and certainly skewed in a SOUTHERN BLACK CITY such as Memphis, TN. ( er, again, in my opinion, and I don’t need statistics to make such a claim..lol)
I wasn’t ‘debunking’ ANYTHING, Mr. Architect/Planner, I was simply REPORTING the actual information THEY reported !
What the devil is your real problem ? lol….I read the surveys, and that’s exactly what was REPORTED, pal.
What’s this ‘show US facts’ crap, fella ? YOU refernced a source, and I simply quoted the ‘refernce’ YOU provided …are you nuts ? or just an URBANUT ? LOL
This is nutty…you provide a ‘reference’, I then quote your reference, then you believe I’m trying to ‘debunk’ the refernce YOU provided…ha ha ha….now that’s STOOO-PED.
I’m not trying to suggest I HOLD THE KEY to what BLACK urban professionals ‘want’……I only know this : You and your positions are not close to what BLACK urban professionals share with me………and I doubt you even talk to many BLACK urban professionals in Memphis in the first place, or you would be ion more TOUCH with REALITY on the ground and with BLACK families in Memphis.
But no, you’re just another white, half-smart, pedantic, self-aggrandizing, self-serving talking head who seems to suggest you’re ‘in charge’ of Memphis planning ‘thought’, and/or at the vanguard of ‘change’ in a city whose majority population is BLACK, not white, er, like YOU ,, without much question, because NO Black architect/planner from Memphis TN would be that arrogant and wrong, pal.
You seem to be just another Anglo/white interloper who doesn’t WANT to see the real problems of Memphis, and the tough, real-life solutions for Memphis’ future.
Your prism needs ‘polishing’ my friend….LOL
Apparently you failed to understand the question.
The “us” are obviously all those that read this blog. Not a hard concept or reference to grasp.
Despite all your blather and hot air you still failed to support any of your notions regarding what “black urban professionals” in Memphis want or how their desires might differ from the results identified in the MPACT study. You offer nothing more than personal opinions and can produce no evidence to support your myopic and shallow perceptions. Others here offer numbers, studies and precedent and all you contribute to the conversation is poor grammar, tired and outdated opinions and shallow attempts to discredit others. You cannot offer real information and have yet to be able to offer anything that might remotely be considered a relevant or interesting approach or opinion- thus you are once again to be isolated as nothing more than a frustrated troll.
By the way, the young, educated black professionals I know and socialize with support most of the ideas and concepts endorsed by the MPACT study.
Is it just me or does does Dumb City and Anonymous 6:49 sound a lot like Tommy Volinchak. You know- the crazy guy that was kicked out of the downtown neighborhood association a few years back and got kicked off the Memphis Flyer site for being an all purpose psycho. Weird. Anyway, don’t let me interupt.