If man bites dog is the definition of news, a couple of stories lately were as predictable as a dog biting a man.
Germantown Mayor Sharon Goldsworthy embellished the image of herself and her city as selfish in the extreme, and a group of ministers with an affinity toward the spotlight embellished their reputation as publicity first, sound policy last.
“I knew we would always get to this day,” said Mayor Goldsworthy at last week’s Charter Commission meeting. The untenable prospect that set her off: That all of us who live in Shelby County would support amenities like parks and recreation, museums, and other quality of life assets.
Apparently, it was just more than she could take, but her defense was ironic (if not comical). She complained that residents of Germantown would be paying twice for parks. Of course, over the years, she would never brook that concept when it was about Memphians paying twice for schools, health and environmental services, FedExForum, The Pyramid, planning and zoning, and more.
Politically convenient logic is always fascinating to watch, but never as much as when Mayor Goldsworthy ties herself into knots to have yet one more reason to criticize the Charter Commission’s heroic work to create an entirely new countywide government.
So Predictable
Stung by criticism that the town mayors weren’t taking part in the process, she’s been a regular guest at the Commission meetings. But it feels more like her intent is to check that box and nullify any additional editorial criticism (or as some wags have said, it’s to watch Millington Mayor Richard Hodges, a member of the Charter Commission, whose down-to-earth opinions occasionally don’t adhere to the party line).
That is not to say that she has contributed anything of substance in her appearances at the Charter Commission. Her comments usually come in the form of an attack rather than a negotiation about language that could address her concerns. Last week’s comments (you can listen online) made her and her city look petty and parsimonious, as the radical thought of supporting countywide amenities sent her off the rails.
Yes, Germantown has its own park system and so it should get a credit for that, but if she would try to think beyond the walls of her preconceived notions, perhaps she could envision ways in which a new metro government could invest in the greenway systems through Germantown. After all, they too are amenities for the entire community and the metro government should help fund them.
It’s a distinctly myopic, and self-serving, point of view since she’s writing her hands over parks, but she’s mute about Memphis Light, Gas & Water becoming a countywide agency with membership on its board from all of the community. But such is the attitude of the ‘burbs. It always seems to be about getting something without paying for it, and any suggestion that we all have a common interest in a common future seems as foreign to the mayor and others as Afghan foreign policy.
The Me Generation
It’s just all so sad. At a time when major communities across the U.S. are pulling together to compete in the global economy, some people are perfectly content to balkanize our county into pockets of special interests acting on “it’s all about me” politics.
At the Charter Commission meeting, as happens regularly, Mayor Goldsworthy after giving her complaints was asked for her recommendations. Of course, she didn’t have any. She decided months ago that she was going to oppose the new charter regardless of what the Charter Commission comes up with.
In truth, the Commission has addressed many concerns that she expressed way back when, and the real question she needs to be asked at the next meeting is this: What would have to be in this charter for you to support it? Do you feel that Germantown has any responsibility as part of a unified community?
Meanwhile, Mrs. Goldsworthy’s former colleague in Collierville, Linda Kerley, reminded the Commission what mayoral leadership looks like. “We’ve got to step in and try to make the best plan so everybody benefits from this charter,” she said.
Profiles in Courage
Speaking of people who have their eye off the ball, some familiar faces among the African-American clergy announced that they are going to pressure Memphis City Council to continue to fund Memphis City Schools. As we all know, the City Council courageously removed school funding from the budget of city government, rightly pointing out that it’s Shelby County Government that’s responsible by law for school funding.
Apparently, this handful of ministers are co-conspirators in the myth-making by the city schools district that the city funding cut led to the layoffs of teachers aides. None of the facts bear this out, and it’s pretty clear that in the $1 billion budget of Memphis City Schools, there were plenty of places to free up money to pay the aides.
The aides’ layoffs were more political theater than a real problem, a fact underscored by the stuck in time rhetoric of Revs. Dwight Montgomery and LaSimba Gray. Their press conference was long on hyperbole and short on facts, and in defending the practice of Memphians paying twice for schools — although 75% of Memphians don’t have children in school and 20% of Memphians live on less than $10,000 a year.
Instead of attacking one of the three most regressive tax structures in the U.S. and an inequitable tax system that means that the less you earn in Memphis, the greater percentage of your income is paid in taxes, the ministers fell to their default positions: educators are always right, politicians are always wrong. Rev. Montgomery said he wants to “focus on the problem, not the symptom” which should lead him away from City Hall altogether and over to Interim Shelby County Joe Ford’s office where they should demand his leadership for the single source funding for schools that is long, long overdue.
Making the Right Things the Right Things
The irony of all this gnashing of teeth is that the Memphis City Schools’ operating budget is significantly larger than City of Memphis and rose at a much higher rate.
If the reverends want to question someone, how about asking Memphis City Schools: In a decade when its enrollment dropped 5%, why did the district’s budget increase about 60% and its workforce doubled? It’s always strange at the double standard in the intergovernmental family. Every issue involving schools is destined to take on the dimensions of a calamitous disaster, while any other part of government has its services treated as dispensable and always ripe for cuts.
Like the mayor of Germantown, these ministers seemingly see our community as pockets of special interest groups, and because they do, they too care little about the big picture and what is overall good policy for our entire community. Because of it, Memphians once again find themselves without any champion for tax equity, fairness and community unity.
Why is the writer of this trashy article such a coward and not sign his/her name to it? Personal attacks will not accomplish anything except a negative reaction such as this one.
Ronald – you assume, incorrectly, that the writer wanted to accomplish something with this post. Every once and a while, these usually reasonable people toss off an attack heavy substance light article against the burbs, or this or that person who is against consolidation. Because SCM cannot conceive of a reasonable basis on which to oppose consolidation, they seem to have concluded that everyone who might be against it is not worthy of their respect. That is the way that SCM has conducted itself throughout this debate and its a shame. When consolidation fails to pass, SCM will only have themselves and others to blame for spending too little time rationally discussing the issues to convince opponents to change their position and too much time simply bashing those who dare disagree.
hear hear.
Other than the lack of a byline, what about this post do you object to? This is a forum for discussion.
When will the courts rule on the school funding issue? I personally believe it’s the county’s job to fund schools, not the city and I would like to get the final verdict so we can move on from there.
I think the Memphis City School organization should be done away with and every school should be run under Shelby County School system. Memphis should be treated like all the other cities in Shelby County when it comes to schools. DeSoto County has one school system and that seems to be working pretty well.
Ronald:
As we’ve said previously, this is a blog that represents our company’s point of view of issues, trends, and urban issues. We’ve had that posted on our blog since it started five years ago. We base these opinions on our work in other cities and our perspective on this one.
Anonymous 7:22:
We did want to point out something with this post – how some people are stuck in time and can’t break free from their own talking points. What makes you think that some of the people writing these posts aren’t from the suburbs? The thing is that we believe that our region (not just Memphis) is on a bubble, and if we allow elected officials and others, wherever they are located, to put their personal ambition ahead of our county’s best interest, we are in serious trouble. Finally, not everyone we know is for consolidation, but they are thoughtful about it, they have done their homework, and they are willing to wait and see what the final charter looks like before taking shots.
PS: We wrote it a couple of weeks ago but you may have missed it. Local government as we know it is going to change whether consolidation passes or not. There is the choice for a new government or there is the choice of Memphis annexing and getting larger and larger until the towns are islands. We suggest you go back and read the posts that analyze both sides of consolidation.
SCM, while I appreciate the not to subtle suggestion that I am uninformed, I have read the posts you have written on consolidation. I can recall none that seriously look at the issue from the anti consolidation side or even from a skeptical point of view. They are almost all of the tenor of this post; they assume the reader already agrees and simply dismisses the other side as incorect. Do better. Invite a true skeptic of consolidation to post on your blog. Or at least post a fair look at the issue from both sides.
Anonymous 1:27. I believe it was explained that this blog presents the views of SCM. If you wish to disagree with these views, the comment section is open to you or anyone else with another perspective. I have had my share of discussions with SCM and find they are willing to look at alternative views and even change their own. How about you?
George, buddy, I was responding to the comment that they have written posts that “analyze both sides.” In my humble opinion, no they really haven’t. Now I agree with you – its their blog and they don’t have to present both sides if they don’t want to. But if they don’t, then they shouldn’t respond to comments like mine but suggesting that they do.
Boy did you say a mouthful about the clergy and MCS!
The budget is already bloated beyond comprehension, and the level of quality is abysmal and all they can think about is business as usual.
HIGHLY CONSPICUOUS BEHAVIOR.
Kinda telling about WHERE the money is going.
It’s not making it to the kids:
The school buildings are a travesty.
Ceilings falling in, unconnected ducts, bathrooms you can smell as soon as the door opens, unconnected security cameras, in most schools, where’s that budget going?
Airconditioner units that don’t even function.
Non-functioning cafeteria equipment.
Decrepit paint needs to be repainted.
BROKEN WINDOWS AND DOORS.
UNREPAIRED BULLETHOLES.
Most schools I’ve seen didn’t have any teachers aids in them.
Where’s that money going?
Then look at the grounds of the schools, no playgrounds, (but we expect creativity) unkept lots with dead shrubs, (but we’re not detracting from the neighborhoods) no grass, no track, and of course the worlds cheapest(but I bet we’re paying a MINT on paper) and worst food ever in the US and it’s not the cooks, it’s the menu, which makes overweight kids galore.
Then look at MCS vehicles, all old. Where’s that budget going?
Each school has a “partner” who does mostly nothing but duck requests for help in most schools. They just want to look good.
It seems like MCS is one big shakedown scam by all those ministers.
No wonder they, in cahoots with many others, don’t want a thing changed about the budget.
The firings are a political ploy to fire people up at the heavy expense of a few “nearly volunteers”, to get sympathy for their sociopathic need for that extra 57 million.
ONE BIG COVERUP of ONE BIG SHAKEDOWN.
Remember when they threw all the records in the street when they were about to be caught fudging grades?
That was criminal but no one filed charges, GET IT?
If WE don’t get MCS straightened out and a realistic budget for the paltry amount of student who still attend their schools instead of the IVY LEAGUE price now, WE HAVE NO HOPE FOR ANY FUTURE. Consolidated or not.
That said, if you don’t consolidate, NONE of the surrounding towns will have any future when Memphis tanks, or, at least when the word gets out that we already tanked a while back.
This is not the behavior or moves of a nontanked city.